Thanks ladies, gosh Marre ......i think I will have to be desperate to read that paper even if the last two hundred are refs. Will save it for a long cold winter's day.
They asked for questions from the Twitter audience at the #HCY2013 conference. I asked if I needed to take 5-methyl for my MTHFR mutation.
This was the response
@HCY2013: @b12unme Prof ***** (UniOxford) - Won't do any harm is best possible answer at the moment. Sufficent B12 level is most critical to maintain.
I note they have prudently not allowed my question to stand on @HCY2013 timeline to accompany the answer. The answer I note does not even mention MTHFR by name!
Covering backsides, no doubt. I think it is shocking that UK scientists appear to have made no effort to find out.
Regards some people not responding to 5-methyl despite having 677T, I can only guess perhaps other genes are also involved in folate metabolism and perhaps compensate for the error. I should point out that the study showing 10% of kids had unmetabolised folic acid was only very small. As you say Andrea, I wish understanding was at a more advanced stage too.
I am utterly sick of it. I am sure these questions are much easier to fathom than they are letting on.
Lessix
PS....on the various MTHFR sites it suggests starting with a low dose of 5-methyl and building up. I plunged straight in with 1,000 mcg with no ill effect, but same dose makes my husband crotchety and anxious. He is going try a lower dose as these sites suggest.